Dickies Pantalon Redhawk Femme (Jambe Régulière)
(WD855)

These trousers are a great fit. I am so pleased that Dickies does women's clothes. I am a volunteer ranger with the National Trust, and was fed up with old walking trousers not fitting properly and not having enough pockets. With the thigh pocket, plus a zipped hip pocket as well as two normal hip pockets and a back pocket, I can carry my phone, keys, spare cash and a handkerchief and still work comfortably.

My favourite pair of work trousers for outdoor work, I have four pairs and recommend them to anyone who will listen!

fit well, good quality excellent

Other half loves them. Womens trousers with lots of big pockets. They are comfy and easy to move around in with a comfortable rather than super tight womens cut. They are also quick drying when wet.

Fitted perfect and quick delivery.

Quite baggy on the legs but a great fit on hips and waist. Had them altered but pleased overall with the price I paid

Seemed to be quite a big jump up between two different sizes - ordered both, so will have to either diet or put on a couple of kilos!

Could do with some bigger sizes

Great fit, better than wearing men’s work trousers. A bit baggy on legs but as I milk cows wouldn’t want them tight. Same issue as everyone else though, they’re too long, 29inch please. That’s the only reason they didn’t get a 5. Ordered & delivered in 2 days.

Comfortable fit. Useful pockets including one with zip fastening. Low rise on the bottom though so could end up baring more than you intend unless wearing a long t-shirt.

Zip broke first time I wore them

Sized too small, I'm an 8 in all other pants/jeans/skirts but these were too tight, sit on hips not waist, which is what I wanted tbh but too small. legs a bit wide also, returned.

Good quality material trauses, nice sewing, but big minus for me is low waist. If i dont have a belt thight, I'd have it in a middle of my bottom all the working time.

Hard wearing, roomy and nice big pockets, very practical. Only (but big) downside is the low rise, had more than a couple of undignified moments at work because of it, high waist shorts on underneath at all times now! Probably won't repurchase once they die to be honest, unless they make them higher.

I returned them as they didn't fit well or have the thickness or collection of pockets I was after. Much preferred the Eishenhower multi-pocket trousers which I bought at same time. Excellent.

Big and baggy, I call them my 'Charlie Chaplins'; I don't feel happy when I wear them.

Brilliant fit, low waisted unlike most women's work wear great quality & wider legged so plenty of room for moving around in. Good value for money & would highly recommend.

Small sizing will not order again

Don't like the product, don't like the material, size is wrong, far too long for regular

The fit was diabolical. These trousers are not fit for the normal figure of a women. No allowance for hips or waist and they fit on the hips. Who wants to work in trousers that are hipsters!

Oh Dickies, what were you thinking? These Dickies women's work trousers are absolutely useless! Obviously designed by a man! I am a female gardener fed up of wearing baggy, long legged, massive crotched men's work trousers so I was exited to find they come designed for women. Alas I was disappointed, they are way too baggy to do any kind of manual work, the legs are flappy and the hips are huge. Now I’m size 16 and a teeny bit overweight but I do not have hips as wide as the M25! I fear If I wore these to work I would be dragged under a tractor or sucked into a chipper due to the excess unnecessary material. So if you are a fan of MC Hammer, are going to a 70s themed night or love to dress as Coco the Clown, then these are the trousers for you!!!

Too manly. I didn't like them but I'll keep them. They were rather shapeless. I work in a garage and fancied some overalls but the trousers didny fit nice